Susanne Langer, an American philosopher primarily interested in art and the mind, is renowned for her contributions to the philosophy of art and aesthetics. One of her most evocative statements is, "Art is the objectification of feeling, and the subjectification of nature." To fully grasp this complex idea, it's essential to unpack Langer's vocabulary and understand the dual functions she attributes to art: objectification and subjectification.
Objectification of Feeling
In the realm of art and aesthetics, "objectification" generally refers to the process of expressing abstract ideas or feelings in a tangible form. According to Langer, art serves as a medium through which emotional experiences are translated into something perceivable and understandable. For example, a painter might channel their feelings of loneliness into a solitary landscape, or a musician might compose a melancholic melody to represent sorrow.
Objectifying feelings through art provides a conduit for emotions to be explored, communicated, and even understood. The result is not just a creation but also an external representation of internal emotions. This enables both the creator and the observer to engage with these feelings in a more structured and analytic manner, bridging the gap between subjective experience and external expression.
Subjectification of Nature
On the flip side, Langer uses the term "subjectification" to discuss how art personalizes or imparts emotional qualities onto nature or objective reality. Subjectification means the attribution of subjective elements, like emotions or intentions, to otherwise neutral or objective entities. In the context of art, this refers to the practice of giving emotional meaning or human characteristics to natural elements, objects, or even abstract concepts.
Take, for instance, the way landscapes are portrayed in different artistic styles. While a realistic painting might focus on the accurate representation of natural features, an expressionist painting would aim to capture the emotional essence of the landscape. Through artistic interpretation, an otherwise indifferent natural setting becomes imbued with emotional or symbolic significance, transforming it from mere scenery to a subject filled with meaning.
Interconnected Roles
What makes Langer's statement particularly compelling is the way it captures the dual and interconnected roles of art in human experience. By objectifying feeling, art offers a structured lens through which we can understand our emotional states. Conversely, by subjectifying nature, art allows us to see the world around us in a deeply personal and emotionally charged way. These two processes are not mutually exclusive but work in tandem to enrich both the creation and appreciation of art.
Philosophical and Artistic Implications
Langer's perspective on art can be seen as a framework that expands beyond simple aesthetics to delve into the realms of psychology, semiotics, and even metaphysics. It challenges us to consider how art serves as a unique form of language—one capable of articulating the complexities of human emotion and the subtleties of the world around us. It also prompts us to reconsider our interaction with art, not merely as passive observers but as active participants in a dialogue between the self and the world.
Conclusion
Susanne Langer’s insightful statement offers a nuanced and multi-layered definition of art as both an objectification of feeling and a subjectification of nature. This dual function enables art to serve as a bridge between our inner emotional world and the external environment, enriching our understanding of both. It serves as a reminder that art is not merely decorative but deeply ingrained in the human experience, reflecting and shaping how we interact with our emotions and the world around us.
Comments