Edward Said, a prominent literary theorist and intellectual, provides a critical lens on the narratives of empires with his statement: "Every empire tells itself and the world that it is unlike all other empires." Said, best known for his work on Orientalism and post-colonial studies, touches on the self-perception and external portrayal of empires throughout history. This article unpacks the implications of Said's observation, discussing how empires create their own self-image and how this impacts their relationships with the world.
The Narrative of Exceptionalism
The cornerstone of Said's observation is the concept of "exceptionalism," where an empire sees itself as unique, different, and often superior to other empires. This self-image is carefully crafted through a variety of mechanisms including propaganda, education, and media. The narrative is not just for internal consumption; it is also presented to the world as a justification for the empire’s actions and existence.
Psychological and Political Functions
Internal Cohesion: The belief in exceptionalism helps to unite people under a common identity and set of values, solidifying internal cohesion within the empire.
Justification for Actions: By considering themselves exceptional, empires find it easier to justify acts that might otherwise be seen as exploitation, colonization, or even warfare.
Differentiating Factor: The narrative of exceptionalism serves to differentiate one empire from its predecessors or contemporaries, even when many of their actions are similar.
Practical Examples
British Empire: The idea of the "civilizing mission" was promoted as a unique aspect of British colonialism, even as it engaged in exploitation and subjugation similar to other empires.
American Exceptionalism: The United States often presents itself as an empire of freedom and democracy, distinct from empires of the past that were built on conquest and subjugation.
Ancient Rome: Roman civilization viewed itself as ordained to bring law and order to the world, a self-image that aided its expansive colonization efforts.
Consequences
Global Perception: How an empire portrays itself affects not only how it is seen by its subjects, but also its diplomatic relationships and the ways in which it engages with other nations and cultures.
Historical Record: This self-imaging often finds its way into the historical record, influencing how future generations understand and interpret the actions of the empire.
Resistance and Opposition: While an empire’s narrative may bolster internal unity, it can also spark resistance from those who question its claims to exceptionalism.
Critical Analysis
Said’s comment prompts a critical analysis of how narratives are constructed and deployed in service of imperial goals. It invites us to scrutinize the stories that empires tell about themselves, asking who benefits from these narratives and at whose expense they are maintained.
Conclusion
Edward Said's keen observation on the self-perceptions of empires offers a framework for understanding the psychological and political mechanisms that underlie imperial actions. The belief in exceptionalism is not just a cultural quirk but a powerful narrative that shapes both domestic policies and international relations. Recognizing this can help us better understand the actions of empires both past and present, and invites us to be critical consumers of the narratives that shape our understanding of history and geopolitics. By questioning the stories that empires tell about themselves, we can uncover deeper truths about the dynamics of power, control, and resistance.
Comments