Alright, let's roll up our sleeves and dive right in. Today, we’re talking about something that’s been quietly shaking the world, one policy at a time—populism and how it’s reshaping migration policies in developed nations. If you’ve ever wondered why immigration is such a hot-button issue lately, why leaders seem to keep changing the rules about who gets to stay and who doesn’t, you’re in the right place. The audience for this conversation is people like you and me: those who want to understand why the world is behaving the way it is, without needing a political science degree to do so. Maybe you’re a student, a curious professional, or just someone trying to make sense of the headlines. We’re gonna take a long, deep look at the issue, but don’t worry—I’ll keep it conversational, like explaining it over a friendly coffee chat.
So, where do we start? Let’s talk about populism. You’ve probably heard this term thrown around on the news, often alongside names like Trump, Orban, Salvini, or Le Pen. But what is it, really? At its core, populism is about the people—it claims to represent the average person against a powerful elite. In its essence, populism loves the idea of being “for the people, by the people,” only sometimes it turns into more of a “for the people we like, by pushing away the people we don’t.” And here's where migration comes in. Migration has become this ultimate litmus test for what a populist agenda might look like when it’s translated into actual policies—a topic that hits right at the heart of identity, economy, safety, and everything that makes people tick when thinking about ‘us versus them’.
Let’s picture it: The year is 2015. There’s a massive migration wave, particularly affecting Europe. Refugees are fleeing conflict zones like Syria, and in some places, they’re welcomed with open arms. Remember Germany and Angela Merkel’s infamous “Wir schaffen das” (“We can do this”)? It was a rallying cry for compassion. But, on the flip side, it sparked a massive political backlash in other parts of Europe. Enter populist leaders who were quick to pounce on the fears of ordinary people—and let’s be honest, there’s always fear when it comes to change, especially rapid change like suddenly sharing your community with thousands of newcomers. So these leaders painted migration as a crisis not just for resources, but for culture, for safety, and for identity.
Now, migration policies in many developed nations have begun reflecting this shift. Once open-door policies are now getting narrower. Countries like Hungary, under Viktor Orban, have built literal fences to keep migrants out. In the U.S., we’ve seen travel bans and family separation policies under Trump’s administration, which directly mirrored the populist notion that “we’ve got to protect our own first.” And it wasn’t just America or Hungary. The United Kingdom’s Brexit, one of the most iconic populist moves, was heavily influenced by the migration debate. Remember the infamous “Take Back Control” slogan? It wasn’t just about laws or regulations—it was about who got to come into the country, who got to stay, and who could be part of that ill-defined but strongly felt notion of ‘us’.
And here’s the thing: Populism loves simple answers. It thrives on “good guys” and “bad guys,” and in the populist narrative, migrants are often cast as the latter. There’s a reason for that—populism feeds on grievances, on the idea that someone else is taking what is rightfully yours. If you can’t find a job, if your wages are stagnant, or if your rent is rising, populist leaders are quick to point out, “Hey, it’s because of all those newcomers,” even when the reality is more nuanced and involves a mix of globalization, technological changes, and, yes, sometimes policy missteps by the very same elites populists love to criticize.
Speaking of narratives, the media plays a massive role. Ever noticed how, during a migration crisis, the news tends to alternate between sympathy and fear? One minute, it’s heart-wrenching images of families struggling for a better life; the next, it’s stories about crime or job competition. Populist leaders are masterful at using these moments, amplifying the fear side of the story. They understand how to appeal to the primal instinct of self-preservation. When Orban’s government talks about migrants, the language often implies an invasion—as if the country is under attack, and only a strong leader can defend it.
In Europe, this is part of what’s known as “Fortress Europe.” It’s a term that’s used, often critically, to describe how EU countries have increasingly focused on hardening their external borders. Institutions like Frontex (the European Border and Coast Guard Agency) have expanded, and the rhetoric has shifted towards control and securitization. Essentially, it’s about keeping people out first, then figuring out who might be allowed in—a complete 180 from the humanitarian rhetoric of the early 2010s. There’s this distinct irony when you think about Europe: the continent that loves to tout human rights now finds itself building barriers, both physical and legal, to restrict those very rights for people seeking refuge.
Across the Atlantic, in the United States, the story has its own twists and turns. The U.S. has always been a nation built by immigrants. But with populist leaders like Donald Trump, the narrative became about ‘good’ versus ‘bad’ immigrants. Remember the “Build the Wall” chants? It wasn’t just about a physical structure—it symbolized the broader idea of shutting out outsiders to preserve what was within. Populism in the U.S. played into longstanding cultural anxieties about change, economic insecurities, and fears of losing a sense of national identity. These anxieties were heightened by sensational media coverage, much of which focused on the potential dangers of illegal immigration while ignoring the nuanced economic and social contributions of immigrants.
And what happens to the people at the center of these debates—the immigrants themselves? Often, the human element is the first casualty of populist policy shifts. People are turned into numbers, statistics to be reduced, whether it’s the number of asylum seekers or the number of deportations. The stories of individuals who migrate—the hopes they have, the risks they take—become drowned out in favor of talking points about ‘floods’ or ‘crises’. Imagine a family leaving everything they know behind, risking their lives for a shot at something better, only to be met with walls, literal or metaphorical, when they arrive. That’s the reality behind many of these populist-driven policies.
There’s also an economic irony at play here that’s worth mentioning. Populist leaders often argue that immigration hurts the ‘working man’ by driving down wages or taking away jobs. But the reality, as most economists will tell you, is more complicated. In countries like Germany, which has an aging population, migrants often fill essential roles in the labor market—roles that otherwise might remain empty. In the United States, the agricultural sector heavily depends on migrant labor. The paradox is that while populist rhetoric claims to protect native workers, some of the industries most vital to the economy are those most dependent on the very immigrants these leaders are working to keep out.
It’s also fascinating how populism cherry-picks when to be “pro-refugee.” Have you noticed how some populist leaders suddenly support refugees when it aligns with other interests? Take Poland, for instance—initially vehemently opposed to taking in refugees during the 2015 crisis, Poland then welcomed Ukrainian refugees with open arms in 2022. Why? Because suddenly, these weren’t seen as ‘others’—they were neighbors, they were ‘like us’, and the cultural and historical connections meant they weren’t perceived as a threat. It’s the perfect illustration of how ‘us versus them’ can shift depending on who the ‘them’ is.
In the big picture, populism has framed migration as a battleground for something much larger: a fight against elites, globalization, and anything that seems to dilute national identity. Populists argue that ‘the people’ are losing control—that decisions about who gets to come in and be part of ‘us’ are being made by far-off bureaucrats or elites who don’t understand or care about local communities. It’s not just about migration. It’s about who holds the power to decide the future of a nation, and populist leaders have used the migration debate to position themselves as the only ones capable of defending that future.
So, has populism succeeded in its goals around migration? Well, that depends on what you consider success. If the goal was to reduce migration numbers, restrict asylum, and harden borders, then, yes, in many ways, it has succeeded. But these policies often come with unintended consequences—like pushing migrants into more dangerous routes, creating humanitarian crises at borders, or even leading to economic shortfalls where labor is desperately needed. And it’s not all set in stone. Policies shift with governments, and we’re seeing backlashes to these backlashes. Leaders who once rode the populist wave are now facing pushback as people tire of exclusionary politics or as economic realities set in.
It’s a complex, ongoing story, with new chapters being written all the time. Migration isn’t going away—it’s a fundamental part of human history, driven by war, opportunity, climate, and countless other forces. Populism, meanwhile, is reshaping how developed nations deal with this reality, turning what could be discussions about integration, opportunity, and growth into battles over who belongs and who doesn’t. But just like any trend, populism’s hold on migration policy could fade, change, or evolve. And maybe—just maybe—we’ll find a way to move the conversation from ‘us versus them’ to just ‘us’.
If you’ve made it this far, you’re probably as fascinated by this topic as I am. And I’d love to hear your thoughts—what do you think about how migration is being handled? Do you see a way forward that balances security with humanity? Drop your comments, share this with someone who might find it interesting, and let’s keep this conversation going. The world is shifting, and it’s up to us to understand why, so we can decide what comes next.
Comments